In Cioffi and Tannin’s indictment, at paragraph 55, the government states “Eventually, investors were told that the Funds had both lost 100% of their respective values, resulting in a total investor loss of approximately $1.4 billion."
So what penalty are these two men facing? That answer is contained in the United States Sentencing Guidelines. Those guidelines contain the convoluted method of assigning points to the dollars lost and certain surrounding events. A full version of the Fraud section of the Sentencing Guidelines are here. This is a copy of the table for crimes of “Basic Economic Offenses” (Non applicable sections have been deleted):
1. THEFT, EMBEZZLEMENT, RECEIPT OF STOLEN PROPERTY, PROPERTY DESTRUCTION, AND OFFENSES INVOLVING FRAUD OR DECEIT
§2B1.1. Larceny, Embezzlement, and Other Forms of Theft; Offenses Involving Stolen Property; Property Damage or Destruction; Fraud and Deceit; Forgery; Offenses Involving Altered or Counterfeit Instruments Other than Counterfeit Bearer Obligations of the United States
(a) Base Offense Level:
…
(2) 6, otherwise.
(b) Specific Offense Characteristics
| | Loss(Apply the Greatest) | Increase in Level |
| (A) | $5,000 or less | no increase |
| (B) | More than $5,000 | add 2 |
| (C) | More than $10,000 | add 4 |
| (D) | More than $30,000 | add 6 |
| (E) | More than $70,000 | add 8 |
| (F) | More than $120,000 | add 10 |
| (G) | More than $200,000 | add 12 |
| (H) | More than $400,000 | add 14 |
| (I) | More than $1,000,000 | add 16 |
| (J) | More than $2,500,000 | add 18 |
| (K) | More than $7,000,000 | add 20 |
| (L) | More than $20,000,000 | add 22 |
| (M) | More than $50,000,000 | add 24 |
| (N) | More than $100,000,000 | add 26 |
| (O) | More than $200,000,000 | add 28 |
| (P) | More than $400,000,000 | add 30 |
(2) (Apply the greatest) If the offense—
(A) (i) involved 10 or more victims; or (ii) was committed through mass-marketing, increase by 2 levels;
(B) involved 50 or more victims, increase by 4 levels; or
(C) involved 250 or more victims, increase by 6 levels.
…
(13) (Apply the greater) If—
(A) the defendant derived more than $1,000,000 in gross receipts from one or more financial institutions as a result of the offense, increase by 2 levels; or
(B) the offense (i) substantially jeopardized the safety and soundness of a financial institution; (ii) substantially endangered the solvency or financial security of an organization that, at any time during the offense, (I) was a publicly traded company; or (II) had 1,000 or more employees; or (iii) substantially endangered the solvency or financial security of 100 or more victims, increase by 4 levels.
(C) The cumulative adjustments from application of both subsections (b)(2) and (b)(13)(B) shall not exceed 8 levels, except as provided in subdivision (D).
(D) If the resulting offense level determined under subdivision (A) or (B) is less than level 24, increase to level 24.
…
(15) If the offense involved—
(A) a violation of securities law and, at the time of the offense, the defendant was (i) an officer or a director of a publicly traded company; (ii) a registered broker or dealer, or a person associated with a broker or dealer; or (iii) an investment adviser, or a person associated with an investment adviser; or
(B) a violation of commodities law and, at the time of the offense, the defendant was (i) an officer or a director of a futures commission merchant or an introducing broker; (ii) a commodities trading advisor; or (iii) a commodity pool operator,
increase by 4 levels.
To determine the number of levels, it is just an addition problem:
Basic Offense 6
Total Loss exceeds $400 million 30
Assume less than 50 “victims” 4
Safety of institutions 4
Violation of securities laws 4
Grand Total 48
With that total of 48 levels, a judge then goes to the “Sentencing Table” to determine the sentence. The full version is here. This is an excerpt.
| Offense Level | Months |
| 19 | 30-37 |
| 20 | 33-41 |
| 21 | 37-46 |
| | |
| 22 | 41-51 |
| 23 | 46-57 |
| 24 | 51-63 |
| | |
| 25 | 57-71 |
| 26 | 63-78 |
| 27 | 70-87 |
| | |
| 28 | 78-97 |
| 29 | 87-108 |
| 30 | 97-121 |
| | |
| 31 | 108-135 |
| 32 | 121-151 |
| 33 | 135-168 |
| | |
| 34 | 151-188 |
| 35 | 168-210 |
| 36 | 188-235 |
| | |
| 37 | 210-262 |
| 38 | 235-293 |
| 39 | 262-327 |
| | |
| 40 | 292-365 |
| 41 | 324-405 |
| 42 | 360-life |
| | |
| 43 | life |
The table above starts at 19 for simplicity in addition to which it is inconceivable that with the bloodlust created by the press and fostered by the government a sentence less than level 19 could be imposed. As you can see, the table only goes to a level 43 which mandates a life sentence.
These men are looking at life in prison! And they have not even been accused with causing any loss! In future posts, I will begin dissecting the indictment, not from a legal viewpoint, but from the viewpoint of one who has already gone through the process.
No comments:
Post a Comment